"We highly recommend Pro Painting of Dallas. Luis was very professional and responsive to our initial inquiries. He helped us with Our paint choices, and because of the quality of the work and the value, we actually expanded our initial job request. His crew member Daniel worked diligently and swiftly to finish the job in one day. Big thumbs up from us on this project!" Westminster House Painting
You don't mention what's actually most important about this kind of wiring. Wireless devices -- cell phones, iPads etc. -- are NOT healthy.Did you know that in the late 1980s, when cell phones were first becoming popular, studies by Dr. Henry Lai and others discovered that cell phone radiation stimulates the release of endogenous opioids in the brains of rats? Perhaps Bill Gates and Steve Jobs knew about this research and applied it at home -- and in their profit strategies. Nora D. Volkow, M.D., director of the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse at the National Institutes of Health has said, Even though the radio frequencies that are emitted from current cell phone technologies are very weak, they are able to activate the human brain. The same applies to wifi and other wireless devices such as wireless smart meters. Those who believe physics proves otherwise should read Some Effects of Weak Magnetic Fields on Biological Systems in the March 2016 IEEE Power Electronics Magazine.In 2015, 150 bioelectromagnetics scientists signed the International EMF (electromagnetic field) Scientist Appeal, asserting that there is more than enough evidence for the World Health Organization (WHO) to justify calling electromagnetic fields probably carcinogenic or simply carcinogenic. The scientists ask the WHO to follow UNESCO’s Precautionary Principle. As of March 22, 2017, the Appeal has 225 signatures from 41 nations.The science keeps accumulating. In May 2017 the Society for Research in Child Development (established in 1933 by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences) published a special section of Child Development that shows the diversity of the use of mobile technology among children and adolescents. The articles point to great complexity in the effects of that usage. Outcomes are mostly negative. Dr. Lennart Hardell, co-editor of this special section, summarizes the research concerning radiation and brain development.Why don’t we know about the risks of wireless devices? Dr. Hardell also recently wrote an article, now available online, to be published in the August 2017 International Journal of Oncology. The article details conflict of interest in the World Health Organization. The WHO has perpetuated the wireless industry’s contention that there is no proof of adverse health effects of radiofrequency radiation unless the exposure is intense enough to heat human brain tissue. The wireless industry’s disinformation campaign is similar to the campaigns waged by tobacco and asbestos producers, involving persuasion through the media, biased science and lobbying. In 2011, Senator Edward Markey and California representative Anna Eshoo asked the Government Accounting Office to review issues related to the safety of wireless devices. The GAO asked the Federal Communications Commission to reassess that agency’s safe exposure limits. The FCC has not done so. The reasons are evident in “Captured Agency” by Norm Alster, former director of the Harvard University Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics Graduate Fellowship Program.Local governments depend on states’ health policy guidance, and states depend on federal agencies for their health policy guidance. Federal governments look to the World Health Organization. At all levels, industry advocates for corporate interests. We saw this last year in Worcester in meetings where National Grid’s expert witness on the safety of wireless meters was Peter Valberg. Valberg is a “hired gun” scientist who has also testified on behalf of the tobacco and asbestos industries.

I was very pleased with the service received from Kind Home Solutions. In late September, Kind Home Solutions painted the exterior of my home. They were professional and punctual in all phases of operations: providing estimates, arranging appointments, brochures, repairs, prep work and painting. The painting crew (JR) did an excellent job and did not scrimp on either paint or caulking, some areas needing multiple coats of paint. The crew completed the job in the estimated amount of time, cleaned up throughout, and hauled away trash. Westminster House Painting


We understand your home is often your most valued asset and emphasize painting every project as if it were our own. It is very important to regularly maintain your exterior services by properly prepping and repainting every 5-7 years. We always recommend using the highest quality products to ensure superior and long lasting protection, and you can expect our paint jobs to last 5-15 years depending on the project... Westminster House Painting CO
I was very pleased with the service received from Kind Home Solutions. In late September, Kind Home Solutions painted the exterior of my home. They were professional and punctual in all phases of operations: providing estimates, arranging appointments, brochures, repairs, prep work and painting. The painting crew (JR) did an excellent job and did not scrimp on either paint or caulking, some areas needing multiple coats of paint. The crew completed the job in the estimated amount of time, cleaned up throughout, and hauled away trash. House Painting Westminster
Expect to pay between $600 to $3,500 or $1.25 to $3 per square foot to coat vinyl, with prices likely increasing for the finish. It is one of the more inexpensive siding materials to have repainted, especially with recent innovations in materials. Changing the finish on your siding is not recommended unless it's completely degraded and worn away by the weather. You can save nearly half the vinyl siding installation cost of $4 per square foot by painting rather than replacing. Before adding a new coat to vinyl siding, 
×