Kind Home Solutions painted our house in the Fall of 2018. They did a beautiful job! We realized just how well they applied the paint in July 2019 when our neighborhood was hit hard by a hail storm. While other houses suffered damage to their paint and siding, we escaped with a handful of chips on one side of the house and some dinged up trim boards that needed to be touched up. However, Kind Home Solutions did not just dab some paint in the chips. They repainted the entire side of our house and the affected trim boards to ensure a better seal against future weather. Working with them is always a pleasure! Their crews are friendly and courteous. Westminster House Painting

If you're concerned about the time it may take to paint your home's exterior, the best time of year to hire a Dallas house painter is generally in the winter. This is not because it's cooler but because it's usually drier. In Dallas, it shouldn't be too cold to paint, but precipitation levels drop reducing the chance your painter's schedule will get pushed back due to rain. Westminster House Painters CO
I just found this company by Googling "Painters in Littleton". They were not the cheapest and not the most expensive but we liked what they said they would do with prepping and painting the outside of our house. Our painters Raymondo and Benito were excellent. The paint job is fantastic and they were very responsive to what we wanted and very careful not to get paint on any surface but the house. I would highly recommend. We are very pleased and would definitely use them again. Westminster Home Painting
By clicking View ProsView Matching Pros, you affirm you have read and agree to the HomeAdvisor Terms, and you agree and authorize HomeAdvisor and its affiliates, and their networks of Service Professionals, to deliver marketing calls or texts using automated technology to the number you provided above regarding your project and other home services offers. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Westminster Home Painting
You don't mention what's actually most important about this kind of wiring. Wireless devices -- cell phones, iPads etc. -- are NOT healthy.Did you know that in the late 1980s, when cell phones were first becoming popular, studies by Dr. Henry Lai and others discovered that cell phone radiation stimulates the release of endogenous opioids in the brains of rats? Perhaps Bill Gates and Steve Jobs knew about this research and applied it at home -- and in their profit strategies. Nora D. Volkow, M.D., director of the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse at the National Institutes of Health has said, Even though the radio frequencies that are emitted from current cell phone technologies are very weak, they are able to activate the human brain. The same applies to wifi and other wireless devices such as wireless smart meters. Those who believe physics proves otherwise should read Some Effects of Weak Magnetic Fields on Biological Systems in the March 2016 IEEE Power Electronics Magazine.In 2015, 150 bioelectromagnetics scientists signed the International EMF (electromagnetic field) Scientist Appeal, asserting that there is more than enough evidence for the World Health Organization (WHO) to justify calling electromagnetic fields probably carcinogenic or simply carcinogenic. The scientists ask the WHO to follow UNESCO’s Precautionary Principle. As of March 22, 2017, the Appeal has 225 signatures from 41 nations.The science keeps accumulating. In May 2017 the Society for Research in Child Development (established in 1933 by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences) published a special section of Child Development that shows the diversity of the use of mobile technology among children and adolescents. The articles point to great complexity in the effects of that usage. Outcomes are mostly negative. Dr. Lennart Hardell, co-editor of this special section, summarizes the research concerning radiation and brain development.Why don’t we know about the risks of wireless devices? Dr. Hardell also recently wrote an article, now available online, to be published in the August 2017 International Journal of Oncology. The article details conflict of interest in the World Health Organization. The WHO has perpetuated the wireless industry’s contention that there is no proof of adverse health effects of radiofrequency radiation unless the exposure is intense enough to heat human brain tissue. The wireless industry’s disinformation campaign is similar to the campaigns waged by tobacco and asbestos producers, involving persuasion through the media, biased science and lobbying. In 2011, Senator Edward Markey and California representative Anna Eshoo asked the Government Accounting Office to review issues related to the safety of wireless devices. The GAO asked the Federal Communications Commission to reassess that agency’s safe exposure limits. The FCC has not done so. The reasons are evident in “Captured Agency” by Norm Alster, former director of the Harvard University Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics Graduate Fellowship Program.Local governments depend on states’ health policy guidance, and states depend on federal agencies for their health policy guidance. Federal governments look to the World Health Organization. At all levels, industry advocates for corporate interests. We saw this last year in Worcester in meetings where National Grid’s expert witness on the safety of wireless meters was Peter Valberg. Valberg is a “hired gun” scientist who has also testified on behalf of the tobacco and asbestos industries.
I just found this company by Googling "Painters in Littleton". They were not the cheapest and not the most expensive but we liked what they said they would do with prepping and painting the outside of… our house. Our painters Raymondo and Benito were excellent. The paint job is fantastic and they were very responsive to what we wanted and very careful not to get paint on any surface but the house. I would highly recommend. We are very pleased and would definitely use them again. more »
Expect to pay between $600 to $3,500 or $1.25 to $3 per square foot to coat vinyl, with prices likely increasing for the finish. It is one of the more inexpensive siding materials to have repainted, especially with recent innovations in materials. Changing the finish on your siding is not recommended unless it's completely degraded and worn away by the weather. You can save nearly half the vinyl siding installation cost of $4 per square foot by painting rather than replacing. Before adding a new coat to vinyl siding,
×